| 
 
 
 | 


| MARTINS BANK AT YOUR SERVICE –
  CORPORATE BANKING | 

| 
 | WHY NOT ALSO
  VISIT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Up, up and away! 
 
 
 It’s only money… 
 
 
 (Each lucky winner will have received a share of £50, which in 1964 was the equivalent of winning about £950 in 2017) 
 Sailing by… 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cap in hand. 
 
 
 Menage a trois? , 
 {Special factors
  affecting Martins
   92. Some of the
  reasons for merging discussed in the foregoing sections apply with especial
  force to Martins, particularly the potential increase in the size of
  facilities required by large companies and the need for wider overseas
  connections.  Equally significant from
  the point of view of Martins are the problems created by incomplete national
  coverage at a time of growth in the geographic range of industrial and
  commercial customers and of greater mobility of personal customers, and the
  high capital cost of attempting to achieve national coverage by the
  establishment of new branches. 
  Furthermore, in recent years there has been an increasing tendency for
  the banks to compete by moving into related fields and by developing
  ancillary services – export houses, factoring, leasing, credit cards,
  etc..  Martins by reason of its size,
  is at a competitive disadvantage in this respect.} 
 
 
 Barclays’ submission to the
  Monopolies Commission 
 Report For Submission To The Monopolies Commission  re The Automation Activities Of Barclays Bank Limited  and The Savings Which Will Result From the Merger Of Barclays, Lloyds And Martins Banks This report is intended to present a factual survey
  of the Automation activities upon which Barclays Bank Limited are engaged.
  The second part of the paper seeks to give an indication of the gains which
  will follow the proposed merger. Equipment The
  Bank's total complement of computers, installed or on order, is as follows:- IBM                  1  x 
  360/65    (purchased)                          4 
  x  360/50    (3 purchased, 1 temporarily rented)                         10 x 360/30     (all purchased)                          3 
  x  1401       (2 purchased, 1 rented) Burroughs                          1 
  x  B8500  (purchased) ICT                   2  x 
  Emidec  1100  (purchased) Punched Card equipment is being built up; so, too,
  are the number of Branch Terminals, Input Machines and Amount Encoding
  Machines.  In all fields the objective
  has been to order sufficient hardware to permit completion of the Bank's
  current plans Computer
  Centres There are seven
  of these either in being or in course of preparation as follows: - 
 Staff 
 Projects in hand or already completed Barclays Bank Limited first became interested in the
  possibilities of automating certain of its activities as long as 10 years ago
  and opened its first branch book-keeping Computer Centre in 1961.  The Bank decided, as a matter of policy,
  not to commit itself to a large scale programme of automation until suitable
  third generation equipment became available. It was only approximately three
  years ago that the decision was taken to move into automation across a very broad
  front. Some of the projects referred to in this report are already completed
  and the remainder will be completed by early 1971. The equipment which is
  shown has been bought or ordered with a view to enabling this to be done and
  where the choice has been between additional equipment and a manual process
  (e. g. teleprocessing as opposed to Van Collection of Input) the decision has
  invariably been to go for the additional equipment and thereby avoid
  increasing our manpower requirements. The projects to which we have referred above are as
  follows: - §  Branch
  Book-keeping §  Standing Orders
  and Direct Debiting §  Clearing
  Operations §  Registrar's
  Department §  Chief Foreign
  Branch §  Executor and
  Trustee Business §  Staff Salaries
  and Statistics §  Barclaycard §  Customer
  Services, e. g   Payroll, Stock Analysis,
  etc.  §  Magnetic Tape
  Exchange between Banks and their Customers.  §  Branch
  Securities  §  Management
  Information  §  Management
  Science Techniques. It will be appreciated that many of these projects
  are of immense magnitude and have involved extensive preparatory work and
  planning. Distribution
  of Activities and Computers Inevitably there are from time to time transfers of
  work and/or machines between Centres, but the following describes the present
  position adjusted to incorporate changes now imminent:- 
 The Willesden Centre, which is to receive the
  Burroughs computer, should be commissioned later this year.   Initially it will undertake only branch
  book-keeping, retaining spare capacity for later developments. Current plans
  are to move the book-keeping now performed at the No.1 and Lombard Street
  Centres and concentrate this at Tottenham Court Road and Willesden by 1971.
  Lombard Street Centre will be closed. No. 1 Centre will be used for computer
  processing of the Foreign work for the three banks. Constraints In its planning the Bank has had to act within two
  main constraints, namely: - 
 Because of these the Bank has had to continue with
  its plans and the execution thereof during the period since its proposal for
  a merger with Lloyds Bank Limited and Martins Bank Limited was referred to
  the Monopolies Commission. Expected Gains from the Proposed Merger
  between Barclays, Lloyds and Martins Banks This part of the paper gives an indication of the
  total gains, both short-term and long-term, which may be expected in: - 
 Both Barclays and Lloyds have particularly heavy commitments
  in respect of branch automation programmes, which they need to meet in full
  before decimalisation.  This date,
  February 1971, therefore becomes a convenient demarcation line between
  “short-term” and “long-term”. The short-term gains can be more readily
  assessed than the long-term ones, though there is no doubt that both will be
  considerable. SHORT-TERM SAVINGS Systems and Development Staff Barclays and Lloyds each have a Systems/Programming
  strength of 150 skilled staff, whilst Martins have 34. These numbers are
  growing and, of necessity, there must be some duplication of effort, so that
  a saving of 125 in the short-term maybe regarded as a conservative estimate.
  It is emphasised that these are highly qualified people whose skills are
  becoming yet more pronounced as computer development progresses Their short
  supply is a national problem which is likely to grow rather than lessen in
  the years ahead. Management Science Management Science in banking is an exciting new
  prospect to which Barclays are increasingly devoting resources.   Their team will grow to some 30 highly
  skilled analysts, comparable in strength to that of Bankers Trust Company of
  New York who are leaders in this field. The Barclays’ team will handle the
  work for the three banks following the merger and there will be no need for
  their duties to be duplicated by Lloyds and Martins. A team of at least
  equivalent numbers to that of Barclays can thus be saved in entirety. These
  are the elite of the operational research area; M.Sc’s and B.Sc’s of high
  calibre who are nationally in great demand. Organisation and Methods Barclays, Lloyds and Martins all have resources allocated
  to this field of operations and Barclays, in particular, are in the process
  of building up their O. & M. section from 50 to some 120 staff so that a
  clerical work improvement programme (Work Study) may be introduced throughout
  the entire bank. Lloyds and Martins will benefit from the manual of
  predetermined time data which is being established, and in addition it is
  considered that one O. & M.  Team
  instead of three will produce short-term savings of at least 25 staff. Martins Branch Automation Martins are about to plan the automation of their
  branch network, which would involve them in central computer equipment
  costing £1,500,000.
  Their 1 million accounts can be accommodated either on Barclays’ Burroughs
  computer, or on Lloyds Birmingham Computer Centre, at an estimated cost of
  not more than £500,000, principally for disk storage. There would be related
  savings of space and of some 60 skilled operating staff. Clearing Departments The total staffs of the three banks’ Clearing
  Departments number more than 2,000. The major savings will follow the
  long-term amalgamation, but short-term it is considered that at least 50
  staff, principally concerned with distribution tasks in the City of London,
  can be saved. Share Registration. Lloyds’ Registrar’s Department is already fully
  automated, using an IBM 360/40 at Worthing. 
  Barclays’ Registrar’s work is in the process of being automated and
  could be comfortably accommodated on the Lloyds’ computer. Apart from
  releasing the Barclays’ computer for other tasks, it is estimated that some
  100 Barclays’ staff would be saved, over and above those that would have been
  surplus following their own automation programme. Credit Cards Lloyds intention to enter the credit card field
  would entail the employment of a minimum staff of 385.  Barclaycard have now developed an extremely
  able staff and have, too, acquired considerable expertise. Their Management
  consider that the Lloyds work could be absorbed into their existing
  organisation at the cost of 100 staff, thus saving 285 people. Computer and
  ancillary equipment savings can be conservatively assessed at £200, 000, whilst Lloyds would also benefit from not
  having to undertake the considerable development work inherent in such an
  operation. Foreign Work Barclays are well advanced with the automation of
  their Chief Foreign Branch. This is an involved and complex task, and Lloyds
  and Martins can take advantage of all the preparatory work which has been
  completed. In addition, by re-arranging their computers Barclays will
  undertake the whole of the Foreign automation work for the three banks, thus
  freeing Lloyds’ and Martins’ computers of an equivalent task. The No. 1 Computer Centre (Drummond Street) will be
  vacated pre-decimalisation and into there will go the IBM 360/50 earmarked
  for Barclays’ Chief Foreign work, together with the “Barclaycard” 360/50 from
  Northampton.     Back-to-back these two
  computers will handle the total foreign work and provide stand-by. Into
  Northampton for the Barclays branch clearing will go the IBM 360/30 which is
  at present spare in the Greater London Centre and to this will be linked the
  duplex 1419’s. The Barclaycard updating run, at present processed on the
  Northampton 360/50, will be run overnight on one of the “Foreign” 360/50’s. Trustee Work Lloyds Bank have already made much progress in the
  systems/programming studies which precede the automation of their Trustee Department.
  Barclays can benefit from the acquisition of this work. Customer Services This is an area into which all the banks will
  increasingly make inroads, undertaking a wide variety of services such as
  payroll, stock control, discounted cash flow and cheque reconciliation.
  Barclays have already developed computer programs and can make these
  available to Lloyds and Martins. Branch Terminals The intention of the three banks is to link all
  their branches to main computer centres by means of terminal equipment and G.
  P. O.  telephone lines.  The terminal equipment costs from £3,000 to £4,000, depending on type, whilst the running
  expenses vary inversely to the capital expended.  For every branch closed, or not
  opened,  following the merger, there
  would therefore be an immediate capital saving of up to £4,000, together with
  lower running costs, whilst the demand for Post Office telephone lines would
  be reduced at a time when the G. P. O. 
  is faced with a major programme of line networks for the banks, to be
  completed by decimalisation.   (See also BRANCH ACCOUNTING) The short-term savings may be summarised
  in the following chart: 
 Annual
  Savings 
 Capital
  Savings 
 Long-Term Savings Capital savings on branch terminal equipment, with
  the corresponding lessening of demand on the G. P. O.  for telephone lines, will continue for as
  long as does the branch rationalisation programme. Every branch closed,  or not opened,  in the future will mean a reduction of up
  to £4, 000 on capital outgoings, plus
  related savings in running expenses. There will, 
  too, be continued saving of Specialist staff and in the long-term it
  is considered that another 50 systems/programmers will be spared as a result
  of combining the research and development work. At that stage,  therefore, 
  the requirements for highly qualified data processing staff will have
  been reduced by some 290,  quite apart
  from the savings to be achieved in the short-term from Registrar’s
  Department, Credit Cards or Clearing Department,  and quite separate from any long-term
  savings which will follow the amalgamation of the Clearing department or the
  Computer Centres. An amalgamation of the Clearing Departments of the
  respective banks can profitably be undertaken. Two courses will be open; to
  merge the entire clearing operations into one London Centre (as against the
  present arrangement of three centres in London and one in Northampton), or to
  process the total branch clearing in Barclays’ branch clearing centre in
  Northampton and amalgamate the general clearing into one London centre. At
  the worst,  this will mean two clearing
  centres instead of four and will produce capital equipment savings in the
  region of £1
  million, since an amalgamation would require 4 fewer reader/sorter systems.
  Not only will this in itself lead to fewer skilled operating staff, but
  further substantial staff savings will follow the removal of the need for
  inter-bank settlement in respect of the considerable quantity of items which
  will automatically change from the category of general clearing to branch
  clearing To quantify more exactly the total benefits which will accrue in
  this area will call for a detailed study by a combined inter-bank team. Further principal gains from the merger will be
  realised when the various branch systems have been rationalised and are fully
  compatible. A joint study team can commence immediately to plan this
  work,  but completion of the task is
  unlikely to be effected before decimalisation. Subsequently, however, with
  full compatibility of branch systems, 
  it will be possible to merge the computer centres of the three banks
  and to complete such an undertaking by about 1974. The merit in having purpose-built centres is
  becoming clear, for in themselves they bring economy of operation. Barclays
  and Lloyds, individually, would certainly have to face this in the seventies.
  Together, and with Martins,  they could
  reap the advantages of a combined operation. Whether the three banks, when
  merged, will wish to go for just two super-centres, one near London and one
  in the North, or for three or four centres sited at various strategic
  geographical points, has yet to be decided. There is something to be said for
  each course. Either way, to a greater or lesser degree, there will stem from
  such an amalgamation the following benefits:- 
 At present it is not possible to quantify these
  long-term savings This will require a detailed investigation of some
  magnitude. What is very evident is that if we job-back to a point in time
  five,  or seven years ago, we can
  visualise the time,  effort and capital
  which could have been saved in the field of automation had we acted in unison
  as one bank rather than as three separate entities. There is every reason to
  believe now that comparable gains will be achieved in the future as the
  result of concerted policy and action. Management
  Services Department, 16th
  April, 1968 Special Thanks to
  Barclays Group Archives What
  might have been? 
 
 
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||